Mayor Keith Corbett said: “The city needs to get out of this business. This is the developer’s business, not the city’s business."
The Marketplace property has proven a failed experiment over
the past 10 years. And even today, the potential outcome is to sell prime
interstate land to an out-of-town developer at a fraction of true market value (less than the city purchased the property for back in 2013). It is
certainly not a good business decision and does not serve the best interests of
the community.
In the meantime, private businesses and private developers
have continued to build Brooking - bringing in TJ Max, Starbucks, Taco Bell,
Hotels, expanding furniture sales, restaurants, and shopping options, and
continuing to work to expand grocery and retail options. It is not the efforts
of the city, but that of private industry that has been the cornerstone of
success in Brookings.
The city needs to get out of the way as they have held this
land hostage for more than 10 years with nothing to show for their efforts
except expense reports. And now, it is again ending with another failed attempt
to bring in the big box prospect they were aiming for. The land should have
been auctioned 10 years ago. And while we cannot go back in time to fix the
mistakes of past years, we can do now what should have been done then - auction
the land and move on.
As a reminder, the story started back in 2013 when the city
of Brookings took possession of this parcel from the State DOT for $1.41 PSF.
Rather than following the traditional path of government disposing of property,
the city of Brookings elected to maintain control of the land due to its ‘vital
importance to the city’s development’.
The first attempt at development took place when the city
partnered with a developer from Kansas City who was going to ‘bring retail to
Brookings’. After paying $78,000 to this out-of-town
developer, the land remained bare.
In 2016, the city took a new run at developing the land and
accepted proposals from regional developers in a troublesomely quick time frame
process – ultimately choosing Bender companies from Sioux Falls and entering
into a contract which placed the city as a partner in this retail development.
If you go back to the meeting in which the agreement was voted on, you will be
reminded that it was not a positive experience for anyone:
Nick Wendell July 26, 1:18:38: “I was not real
comfortable with the timeline. We were a bit flawed early on. It
gave the appearance that we wanted to be inclusive of those folks that
submitted proposals, but we really weren’t being inclusive because we did not
have their full proposal so their term sheets did not mean a whole lot. I hope
we do use it to inform our processes moving forward. Use it as a learning
opportunity.”
In the May 10 meeting, then Mayor Keith Corbett said
this: “The city needs to get out of this business. This is the developer’s
business, not the city’s business. “
While no progress was made from the date of initial contract
with Bender through 2023, per Benders contract, they too were eligible for
three payments totaling $90,000. The first payment made when they held a town
hall meeting… Ultimately they received payments totaling $140,000.
Now the city looks to enter into an agreement with Ryan and
Co out of Minneapolis to sell the prime 10 acres of land for $1.40/sq ft. It is true to say that only
the city could facilitate this deal as no private entities could reach into the
citizens pockets to help make those numbers pencil out.
We have lost tax revenue, we have spent money sending city
personnel to Las Vegas to recruit retail, we have paid for wetland mitigation,
paid developers who yielded nothing. Now is the time to treat the property
fairly, auction it to the highest bidder, and let someone do something with it.
The city maintains a say in the development of the land as it is in a (Planned
Development District) PDD. Selling it as a loss leader to a single entity
chosen by the city is not the right way forward
Comments
Post a Comment